Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41


96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched August 2009

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") posses different sensor dimensions.

The WG-70 was manufactured 10 years after the TX1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-70 grades versus the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony TX1
WG-70 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 128 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh WG-70
TX1 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony TX1
WG-70 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 features physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-70 vs the TX1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and TX1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-70 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will render more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-70 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $350 |