Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
96 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung DV300F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very similar and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-80 was released 10 years after the DV300F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-80 matches up versus the DV300F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-80 & Samsung DV300F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung DV300F
| WG-80 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 | January 2012 | More modern by 127 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Ricoh WG-80
| DV300F | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung DV300F
| WG-80 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-80 provides outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-80 and the DV300F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-80 and DV300F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and DV300F.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files though you really should consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger WG-80 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung DV300F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2022-05-19 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.70 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 133g (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $200 |