Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-80 was unveiled 9 years later than the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-80 scores against the Galaxy Camera 4G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-80 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| WG-80 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 | August 2012 | More recent by 119 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh WG-80
| Galaxy Camera 4G | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 4.8" | 2.70" | Larger display (+2.1") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| WG-80 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-80 offers outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-80 compared to the Galaxy Camera 4G.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-80 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The visual below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-80 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-80 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2022-05-19 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.70" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | On, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $300 | $550 |