Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as IT100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung SL820, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-80 was unveiled 13 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WG-80 grades versus the SL820 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung SL820. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung SL820
| WG-80 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 162 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh WG-80
| SL820 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung SL820
| WG-80 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-80 has physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung SL820 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-80 versus the SL820.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-80 and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-80 and SL820.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to resolve more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-80 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung SL820 |
| Alternative name | - | IT100 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2022-05-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.70" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |