Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Additionally Known as ST500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung TL220, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-80 was revealed 12 years later than the TL220 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the WG-80 scores against the TL220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung TL220. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung TL220
| WG-80 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 156 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh WG-80
| TL220 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung TL220
| WG-80 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-80 enjoys external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung TL220 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung TL220 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-80 versus the TL220.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-80 and TL220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-80 and TL220.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to show greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer WG-80 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2022-05-19 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.70" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 169 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $90 |