Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung WB210, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-80 was brought out 10 years after the WB210 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-80 scores vs the WB210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-80 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 132 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-80
| WB210 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB210
| WG-80 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-80 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung WB210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-80 vs the WB210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to result in more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-80 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2022-05-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.70 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $279 |