Clicky

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-80 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2022
  • Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WG-80 was manufactured 8 years later than the WB35F and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the WG-80 grades vs the WB35F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung WB35F

 WG-80 WB35F 
ReleasedMay 2022January 2014Fresher by 102 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh WG-80

 WB35F WG-80 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB35F

 WG-80 WB35F 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.70"2.7"Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-80 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-80 vs the WB35F.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-80 and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-80 and WB35F.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you will want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-80 should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
43
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
37
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
55
environment sealing
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
43
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB35F Travel photography advice
71
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than average in class (194g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography features
44
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.70 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
43
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB35F Vlogging factors
31
pretty wide (28mm)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic port
31
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh WG-80Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-80 Samsung WB35F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2022-05-19 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.70" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash modes On, off -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 grams (0.43 lbs) 194 grams (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $130