Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB750, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-80 was announced 10 years later than the WB750 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-80 scores against the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung WB750
| WG-80 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 131 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh WG-80
| WB750 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB750
| WG-80 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-80 provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-80 vs the WB750.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-80 and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-80 and WB750.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to render more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-80 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2022-05-19 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.70 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $339 |