Clicky

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-80 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2022
  • Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets look closer at the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-80 was released 9 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WG-80 scores versus the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung WB800F

 WG-80 WB800F 
LaunchedMay 2022January 2013More recent by 114 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-80

 WB800F WG-80 
Display dimensions3"2.70"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB800F

 WG-80 WB800F 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-80 offers external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-80 compared to the WB800F.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and WB800F.

To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you might want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-80 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-80
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
43
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
43
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Street photography information
Samsung WB800F Street photography information
55
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Sports photography features
Samsung WB800F Sports photography features
43
good megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
71
weather sealing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
44
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
good megapixels (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.70 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging information
Samsung WB800F Vlogging information
31
decently wide (28mm)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
does not have microphone jack
35
rather wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (218g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh WG-80Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-80 Samsung WB800F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2022-05-19 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.70" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash settings On, off -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 gr (0.43 lb) 218 gr (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $300 $300