Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-80 was introduced 10 years later than the WB850F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WG-80 grades vs the WB850F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-80 & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung WB850F
| WG-80 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 127 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh WG-80
| WB850F | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung WB850F
| WG-80 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-80 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-80 against the WB850F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and WB850F is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and WB850F.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images but you should really take the age of the cameras into account. The newer WG-80 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung WB850F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2022-05-19 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.70 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $599 |
