Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL80, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was launched 4 years later than the CL80 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-M1 grades vs the CL80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung CL80
| WG-M1 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CL80 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+2.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL80
| WG-M1 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the CL80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and CL80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and CL80.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you have to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $400 |