Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung DV150F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was revealed 21 months after the DV150F making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the DV150F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung DV150F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung DV150F
| WG-M1 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| DV150F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung DV150F
| WG-M1 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung DV150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 and the DV150F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and DV150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and DV150F.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung DV150F to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung DV150F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $150 |