Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was released 8 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-10
WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 98 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
GX-10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 2.5" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
Screen resolution | 210k | 115k | Clearer screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-10
WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the GX-10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and GX-10.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.5" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $2,000 | $850 |