Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was released 8 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-10
| WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 98 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| GX-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 2.5" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Screen resolution | 210k | 115k | Clearer screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-10
| WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the GX-10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and GX-10.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $850 |