Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was released 8 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-10
| WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 98 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| GX-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 2.5" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Screen resolution | 210k | 115k | Clearer screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-10
| WG-M1 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the GX-10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and GX-10.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $850 |