Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-M1 was released 8 years later than the GX-1S and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-M1 grades against the GX-1S with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-1S
| WG-M1 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | January 2006 | Fresher by 106 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-M1
| GX-1S | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 2.5" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Screen resolution | 210k | 115k | Crisper screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-1S
| WG-M1 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 against the GX-1S.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and GX-1S.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 605 grams (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $850 |