Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was released 8 years later than the GX-1S and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-M1 grades against the GX-1S with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-1S
| WG-M1 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | January 2006 | Fresher by 106 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-M1
| GX-1S | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 2.5" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Screen resolution | 210k | 115k | Crisper screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-1S
| WG-M1 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 against the GX-1S.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and GX-1S.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 605 grams (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $850 |