Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Announced January 2008
- Succeeded the Samsung GX-10
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is relatively similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) use different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was introduced 6 years after the GX-20 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the GX-20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-20. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung GX-20
WG-M1 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | January 2008 | Newer by 81 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Ricoh WG-M1
GX-20 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung GX-20
WG-M1 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-20 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 vs the GX-20.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and GX-20 is 91 and 58 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and GX-20.
All in all, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung GX-20 will offer you greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung GX-20 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2008-01-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4688 x 3120 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 800g (1.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $2,000 | $850 |