Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
60 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-M1 was introduced 9 months later than the Galaxy Camera 2 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the Galaxy Camera 2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| WG-M1 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | January 2014 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Galaxy Camera 2 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 4.8" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+3.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 115k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| WG-M1 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 features physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has measurements of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 vs the Galaxy Camera 2.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and Galaxy Camera 2 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and Galaxy Camera 2.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 to resolve greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 283 gr (0.62 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | Built-in |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $400 |