Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93a48/93a48088c8740449c979ab5259a559c94f1a5a5a" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 front Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-M1 was introduced 9 months later than the Galaxy Camera 2 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the Galaxy Camera 2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
WG-M1 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Ricoh WG-M1
Galaxy Camera 2 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 4.8" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+3.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
WG-M1 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 features physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has measurements of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 vs the Galaxy Camera 2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c72/62c72561c5a71902c97f57c2000b5209f5c0112d" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and Galaxy Camera 2 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb439/bb439081a3a2afc7ba663e6527f1d3a8932c658c" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and Galaxy Camera 2.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 to resolve greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a2d/68a2dfe5f21fa7cbaefc966fde0afd24f16a9d29" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/033ba/033bae4dc50b46122c5e259102350bc37fb51999" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5" | 4.8" |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 283 gr (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | Built-in |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $2,000 | $400 |