Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ10W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years later than the HZ10W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-M1 scores versus the HZ10W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ10W
| WG-M1 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ10W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ10W
| WG-M1 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ10W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 against the HZ10W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and HZ10W.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $300 |
