Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as WB550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years after the HZ15W which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-M1 scores against the HZ15W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung HZ15W. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ15W
| WG-M1 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ15W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ15W
| WG-M1 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 and the HZ15W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and HZ15W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and HZ15W.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $2,000 | $330 |