Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is WB600
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was revealed 4 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the HZ30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung HZ30W. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-M1 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ30W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-M1 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 vs the HZ30W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and HZ30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and HZ30W.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also Known as | - | WB600 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $280 |