Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was revealed 4 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-M1 scores against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-M1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ35W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-M1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 versus the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The pic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and HZ35W.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $300 |
