Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was introduced 4 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-M1 matches up against the HZ50W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung HZ50W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ50W
| WG-M1 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | May 2010 | Fresher by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ50W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ50W
| WG-M1 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung HZ50W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the HZ50W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and HZ50W is 91 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and HZ50W.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The newer WG-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also called as | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $2,000 | $250 |