Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was revealed 2 years later than the NX200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the NX200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX200. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX200
WG-M1 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NX200 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 115k | Clearer display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX200
WG-M1 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the NX200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NX200 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and NX200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX200 will show greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-09-12 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 223 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 330 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | BC1030 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $818 |