Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX210
- Refreshed by Samsung NX500
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was brought out 10 months later than the NX300 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX300
WG-M1 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | November 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NX300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Screen resolution | 768k | 115k | Crisper screen (+653k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX300
WG-M1 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 against the NX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and NX300 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and NX300.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-09-12 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.5" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 331 gr (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $2,000 | $750 |