Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88e39/88e39539c7bceca518d0851891959c447d7708f4" alt="Samsung NX5 front Samsung NX5 front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung NX5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NX5 (15MP) is very close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX5 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-M1 was unveiled 4 years later than the NX5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-M1 scores against the NX5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX5. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX5
WG-M1 | NX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 53 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NX5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX5
WG-M1 | NX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung NX5 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") along with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung NX5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 and the NX5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21ed0/21ed00a5b97bd88b060777db234cdeec3220c9fc" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and NX5 is 91 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0608/e0608b8b2ceec59d415840628b3aeb134046126d" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NX5.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX5 will render extra detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bd42/8bd425bd60c507d96ec285d76b997e940e633e00" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e25a/7e25ad1e577e69d70d56c5d11afbde71a2fe9322" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX5 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 499 gr (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 400 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $2,000 | $499 |