Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was announced 4 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung PL200. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung PL200
| WG-M1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 51 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| PL200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung PL200
| WG-M1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 has exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 against the PL200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and PL200.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you really should consider the age of the cameras into account. The younger WG-M1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung PL200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | BP70A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $0 |
