Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is PL70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL720, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the SL720 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was released 5 years after the SL720 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-M1 scores versus the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL720. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL720
| WG-M1 | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL720 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL720
| WG-M1 | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL720 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 vs the SL720.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and SL720 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and SL720.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL720 |
| Also called | - | PL70 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-07-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $119 |