Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST600, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was launched 4 years after the ST600 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the ST600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST600. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST600
| WG-M1 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| ST600 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+2") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+1037k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST600
| WG-M1 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST600 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 versus the ST600.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and ST600 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and ST600.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-M1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST600 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB07 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $330 |
