Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST65, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years after the ST65 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST65
| WG-M1 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| ST65 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST65
| WG-M1 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 and the ST65.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and ST65.
Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you should consider the age of the cameras into account. The younger WG-M1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST65 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $130 |
