Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST80 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was launched 4 years after the ST80 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-M1 scores versus the ST80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung ST80. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung ST80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST80
| WG-M1 | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST80 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| ST80 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST80
| WG-M1 | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST80 has measurements of 92mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the ST80.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and ST80 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and ST80.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of images though you have to consider the age of the cameras into account. The newer WG-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST80 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 4800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 118 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | BP70A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $249 |