Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Announced September 2014
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced April 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-M1 was revealed 3 years later than the ST93 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-M1 matches up against the ST93 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST93

 WG-M1 ST93 
IntroducedSeptember 2014April 2011More recent by 42 months

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 ST93 WG-M1 
Display size3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution460k115kCrisper display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST93

 WG-M1 ST93 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 and the ST93.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and ST93 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and ST93.

All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung ST93 to give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography information
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography information
30
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
30
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography details
Samsung ST93 Street photography details
53
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
maximum ISO low (800)
49
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography features
Samsung ST93 Sports photography features
38
good megapixels (14MP)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
27
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Travel photography with Samsung ST93
64
good battery pack (350 shots)
weather proofing
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Landscape photography camera
35
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (1.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
38
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
Vlogging with Samsung ST93
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of mic jack
27
good maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST93
 Ricoh WG-M1Samsung ST93
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-M1 Samsung ST93
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2014-09-12 2011-04-20
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range (1×) ()
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 115 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed - 8 secs
Max shutter speed - 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options no built-in flash -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 grams (0.42 pounds) 110 grams (0.24 pounds)
Physical dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC, internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $2,000 -