Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was announced 3 years later than the ST95 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST95
| WG-M1 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| ST95 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST95
| WG-M1 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the ST95.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and ST95.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $145 |
