Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as PL100
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL205, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was launched 4 years after the TL205 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the TL205 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL205
| WG-M1 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL205 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL205
| WG-M1 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the TL205.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TL205 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and TL205.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL205 |
| Alternative name | - | PL100 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $180 |