Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was launched 5 years later than the TL220 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-M1 grades versus the TL220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung TL220. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL220
| WG-M1 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL220 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL220
| WG-M1 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the TL220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and TL220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and TL220.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also called as | - | ST500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 169 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $90 |