Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was launched 5 years later than the TL220 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-M1 grades versus the TL220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung TL220. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL220
| WG-M1 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL220 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL220
| WG-M1 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the TL220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and TL220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and TL220.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also called as | - | ST500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 169 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $90 |