Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Announced September 2014
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2009
  • Also referred to as ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

The following is a extended overview of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL225, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-M1 was unveiled 5 years after the TL225 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-M1 scores against the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL225

 WG-M1 TL225 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014August 2009Newer by 62 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 TL225 WG-M1 
Screen size3.5"1.5"Bigger screen (+2")
Screen resolution1152k115kCrisper screen (+1037k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL225

 WG-M1 TL225 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL225 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 vs the TL225.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The pic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and TL225.

All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Portrait photography camera
30
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
21
no manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Street photography with Samsung TL225
53
environment proofing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
max ISO too low (800)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competitors (187 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Sports photography with Samsung TL225
38
good megapixels (14MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Travel photography highlights
64
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
environment proofing
good megapixels (14MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
provides focus by touch
has built in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (187g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Landscape photography camera
35
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
37
pretty wide (27mm)
very good size screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging advice
Samsung TL225 Vlogging advice
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic support
29
pretty wide (27mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (187 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL225
 Ricoh WG-M1Samsung TL225
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Samsung TL225
Other name - ST550
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2014-09-12 2009-08-13
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range (1×) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Highest aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.5 inches 3.5 inches
Screen resolution 115k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed - 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.40 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lb) 187 gr (0.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 SLB-07A
Self timer - Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage type microSD/microSDHC, internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $2,000 $488