Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Also referred to as ST550
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL225, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was unveiled 5 years after the TL225 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-M1 scores against the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL225
| WG-M1 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL225 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+2") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+1037k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL225
| WG-M1 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung TL225 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 vs the TL225.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The pic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and TL225.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL225 |
| Other name | - | ST550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 187 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $488 |