Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as ST5000
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was announced 4 years after the TL240 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the TL240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL240
| WG-M1 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL240 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL240
| WG-M1 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 vs the TL240.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and TL240.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of images but you need to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-M1 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $2,000 | $171 |
