Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was introduced 5 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-M1 scores vs the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL320
| WG-M1 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL320 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL320
| WG-M1 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the TL320.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and TL320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also referred to as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $380 |
