Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was released 9 months after the WB1100F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the WB1100F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB1100F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB1100F
| WG-M1 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB1100F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB1100F
| WG-M1 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB1100F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and WB1100F is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and WB1100F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB1100F to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 512 grams (1.13 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $250 |