Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was brought out 2 years after the WB150F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the WB150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB150F
| WG-M1 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB150F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB150F
| WG-M1 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the WB150F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and WB150F.
To sum up, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you will need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The newer WG-M1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $2,000 | $230 |
