Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was introduced 3 years after the WB210 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the WG-M1 grades against the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-M1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 39 months |
| Display resolution | 115k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+114k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB210 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+2") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB210
| WG-M1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 features outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and WB210.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you have to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher WG-M1 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $279 |