Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was announced 9 months after the WB2200F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB2200F
| WG-M1 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB2200F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB2200F
| WG-M1 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the WB2200F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and WB2200F.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 708g (1.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | BP-1410 |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $2,000 | $599 |