Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB350F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was manufactured 9 months after the WB350F so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB350F
| WG-M1 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB350F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB350F
| WG-M1 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and WB350F.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $260 |