Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years later than the WB750 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the WB750 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB750
| WG-M1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB750 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB750
| WG-M1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and WB750.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $339 |