Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years later than the WB750 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the WB750 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB750
| WG-M1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB750 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB750
| WG-M1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and WB750.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $339 |