Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Launched September 2014
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB850F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WG-M1 was unveiled 2 years later than the WB850F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WG-M1 scores vs the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB850F

 WG-M1 WB850F 
RevealedSeptember 2014January 2012More recent by 33 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh WG-M1

 WB850F WG-M1 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen dimension3"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution614k115kSharper screen (+499k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB850F

 WG-M1 WB850F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB850F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB850F.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and WB850F is 91 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and WB850F.

To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB850F to offer extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB850F Portrait photography features
30
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
43
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Street photography highlights
53
environment proof
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low max ISO (800)
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (250 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography info
Samsung WB850F Sports photography info
38
good MP (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography details
Samsung WB850F Travel photography details
64
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
environment proof
good MP (14MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average in class (250g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography info
35
good MP (14 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
49
has manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
Vlogging with Samsung WB850F
26
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone support
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (250 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB850F
 Ricoh WG-M1Samsung WB850F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Samsung WB850F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-09-12 2012-01-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range (1×) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 115k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 8 secs
Highest shutter speed - 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lbs) 250 grams (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 SLB-10A
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $2,000 $599