Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13eba/13eba33ccbe166c59c9f9853741b21ecd136ed99" alt="Sigma DP2s front Sigma DP2s front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2010
- Superseded the Sigma DP2
- Successor is Sigma DP2x
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2s, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-M1 was manufactured 4 years later than the DP2s and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-M1 grades against the DP2s in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sigma DP2s. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma DP2s
WG-M1 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Ricoh WG-M1
DP2s | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2s
WG-M1 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2s has sizing of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2s in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 against the DP2s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47703/47703a609bfb11032ecea1bf32b2f8ca9ebd1ff2" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and DP2s is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c28f5/c28f534be2290304b257f21e0e4bfafe2150dee7" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and DP2s.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-M1 will show greater detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38688/386881c0061142a89ef327d9144389238f3b8440" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd20/3bd204e7bbc3f476d766e45a9492b284937f342b" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2s |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 280 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $2,000 | $940 |