Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
86 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Sigma DP2s
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and DP2x (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was unveiled 3 years after the DP2x which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-M1 matches up against the DP2x with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sigma DP2x. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma DP2x
| WG-M1 | DP2x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Ricoh WG-M1
| DP2x | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2x
| WG-M1 | DP2x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2x has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") having a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 against the DP2x.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and DP2x is 91 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and DP2x.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer more detail having an extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2x |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | True II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 41mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 15s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 280 gr (0.62 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $699 |