Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Later Model is Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma SD10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was announced 10 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WG-M1 scores versus the SD10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sigma SD10. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma SD10
| WG-M1 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | March 2004 | Fresher by 128 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SD10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 1.8" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 130k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma SD10
| WG-M1 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the SD10.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and SD10 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and SD10.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-M1 will result in greater detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma SD10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $2,000 | $198 |