Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was revealed 17 months earlier than the Quattro which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma Quattro
WG-M1 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh WG-M1
Quattro | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | September 2014 | More recent by 17 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 115k | Sharper screen (+1505k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma Quattro
WG-M1 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and Quattro is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and Quattro.
All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will offer more detail because of its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older WG-M1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30s |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $738 |