Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-M1 was revealed 17 months earlier than the Quattro which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma Quattro

 WG-M1 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh WG-M1

 Quattro WG-M1 
RevealedFebruary 2016September 2014More recent by 17 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution1620k115kSharper screen (+1505k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma Quattro

 WG-M1 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the Quattro.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and Quattro is 91 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and Quattro.

All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will offer more detail because of its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older WG-M1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography advice
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography advice
30
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
81
you can focus manually
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
53
weather sealing
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
maximum ISO low (800)
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (625 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
38
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
better than average battery power (350 shots)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
70
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography info
Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
64
better than average battery power (350 shots)
weather sealing
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
weather proofing
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (625g)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography info
35
good megapixels (14MP)
weather sealing
better than average battery power (350 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging details
Sigma Quattro Vlogging details
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic support
22
comes with face detection autofocus
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great ( resolution)
no external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (625 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma Quattro
 Ricoh WG-M1Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2014-09-12 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range (1×) -
Max aperture f/2.8 -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.5" 3"
Display resolution 115k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30s
Max shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 pounds) 625 grams (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media microSD/microSDHC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $2,000 $738