Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro H, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) come with different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was released 17 months earlier than the Quattro H which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the WG-M1 scores versus the Quattro H in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma Quattro H
WG-M1 | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh WG-M1
Quattro H | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | September 2014 | Newer by 17 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 115k | Sharper screen (+1505k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma Quattro H
WG-M1 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the Quattro H.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and Quattro H is 91 and 78 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and Quattro H.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged WG-M1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 45MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $1,134 |