Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was introduced 6 years later than the A200 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-M1 grades against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A200
WG-M1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | July 2008 | More recent by 75 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A200 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A200
WG-M1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 versus the A200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and A200.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $2,000 | $100 |