Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A300, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was launched 6 years later than the A300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WG-M1 scores against the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A300
| WG-M1 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2008 | More recent by 81 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| A300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A300
| WG-M1 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the A300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and A300.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 632 gr (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $0 |